@calivan thank you!
@garfield you can't prove shit, lasagne cat
@it_wasnt_arson it has a constant low hum to it which is intimidating as heck, its brilliant
@virtualwolf thank you 😊
@betalars yeah, there is a huge difference between critique that's asked for and this. If you want feedback then it's a good thing.
Well this is pretty fucking good if you're on a budget and need storage. 16 quid for 512gb micro sd. 😲😳 https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B082518P6L/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_i_ZbGlEbEWQSKR6
@hil this sounds far more sensible
If you're going to give me *technical* critique, not just aesthetic, then understand that you are automatically wrong anyway because my camera settings are a clusterfuck and I'm winging it. You'd be better off telling me to throw the camera into a pond
Thing is with giving artists unsolicited critique on their work is you have no idea the motivation behind their doing it and no idea what their desired outcome is.
Whatever you think they could have done to improve on it is often going to be wrong, even if you believe it's correct. Rarely are views and motivations on art going to align, and by giving unsolicited advice on how it could be done "better" you're just straight up being a dick.
@vinyd thank you
@sophia i’ve been hunting in these woods all my life and i’ve never seen hide nor hair of a FOSS. something that free and open would leave a trace, wouldn’t it? but every year the FOSSers come to their little convention to talk in my backyard about software, which isn’t even real either!
@garfield open source is a lie. Some deep state psyop shit
sparkle sparkle, bitches